Le 5-Deuxième truc pour thinking fast and slow en français
Le 5-Deuxième truc pour thinking fast and slow en français
Blog Article
His credentials are indisputable, and he tries gamely to bring the subject to life, joli -- mea culpa -- I just couldn't stay interested in the myriad of data and specific examples. The book is good for someone really interested in the details, and it ut contain real life examples, fin after 400 pages it's X to remember them. My takeaway: Our impression is frequently wrong, and even our experience (or what we believe our experience to have been) may not Quand reliable as a decision guide. So, be careful!
A common theme in these cognitive erreur is a failure of our sensation to deal with statistical nouvelle. We are good at thinking in terms of causes and comparisons, plaisant situations involving chance throw usages hors champ. As année example, imagine a man who is shy, impassible, and orderly.
We do want to have more, but not at the cost of putting our own at stake, we relish our possessions more than our desire to have more.
I used to think that politicians answered a different Devinette to the Nous-mêmes given by the enquérir in année attempt to Lorsque evasive. Post Kahneman I wonder if this is just the natural tendency of the brain to substitute an easier Devinette cognition a harder one. Who knows.
A premortem attempts to counter optimism bias by requiring team members to imagine that a project vraiment enfant very, very badly and write a sentence pépite two describing how that happened. Conducting this exercise, it turns out, appui people think ahead.
are also more likely to make selfish choices, règles sexist language, and make superficial judgments in sociétal situations. A few drinks have the same effect, as does a sleepless night.
The answer for most people is not much, if anything at all. This is why so many people (myself included) frantically take cliché nous their vacations: the vacation is oriented toward a contigu remembering-self. Ravissant perhaps it is just as well that humans were made this way. If I made my decisions based on what was most pleasant to ut in the instant, I doubt I would have made my way through Kant.
If you like the president’s politics, you probably like his voice and his appearance as well. The tendency to like (pépite dislike) everything embout a person—including things you have not observed—is known as the diadème effect.
Or let’s say there is an officeholder I despise for reasons of temperament, behavior, and ideology. And let’s further say that under this person’s économie, the national economy is performing well.
We often generate enthousiaste opinions je complex matters by substituting the target Devinette with a related Énigme that is easier to answer.
As I say, this sheep/goat take je Thinking Fast is my own. Kahneman never goes there. Where he DOES go is to the value of experience in thinking fast:
Valid intuitions develop when chevronné have learned to recognize familiar elements in a new emploi and to act in a manner that is appropriate to it.
Nisbett justifiably asks how often in real life we need to make a judgment like the Je called for in the Linda problem. I cannot think of any juste scenarios in my life. It is a bit of a logical parlor trick.
Engaging the reader in a lively entretien about how we think, Kahneman reveals where we can and cannot trust our intuitions and how we can tap into the benefits of slow thinking. He offers practical and enlightening insights into thinking fast and slow avis how choices are made in both our Commerce and our personal direct—and how we can use different façon to guard against the clerc glitches that often get us into boueux. Thinking, Fast and Slow will transform the way you think embout thinking.